Temple Worship and Management - Learning From The Śaivāgama-s
A series of articles on temples, Śaivāgama-s and temple management has been gestating for a long time yet I wasn’t sure if I was the most qualified
medium. With so many stalwart scholars, historians, speakers, researchers, what could I - an upstart learner - have to say that would be valuable?
Valuable or not, today I throw self-doubt aside to honour a great academician, Śaivāgama scholar, President awardee and member of the prestigious Ordre des Palmes Académiques – the nonagenarian Pandit Sivasri Sambanda Sivacharya, who passed
away a few hours ago, on the 16th of June 2019.
After stints at the Theosophical Society, Government Oriental Manuscript Library Chennai, Saraswati Mahal Library Tanjavur, Thiruvananthapuram Library and Mysore Oriental Research Library, Sivasri Sambanda Sivacharya worked with the French Institute
of Indology (now IFP) for decades, first collecting precious manuscripts door to door from all over South India along with the late Pandit N. R. Bhatt, helping build what
is now a UNESCO Memory of the World Collection of Śaiva manuscripts and then helping to critically edit, translate and publish many of the Śaivāgama-s. He also established a printing press and published many books. To
the end, he was reading, editing, translating, mentoring and
strategising to muster enough resources to publish as many of the āgama-s as he could.
He truly leaves a giant void – of vision, scholarship, dedication,
hardwork and tapas. We are shaken. The only tribute that befits mama is one of
furthering the public knowledge and appreciation of the āgama-s. And so today, on a Jyeṣṭha
Pūrṇimā, with humble pranams at his feet, and that of my
ancestors, my generous gurus and the many giant scholars who've paved the way, I begin.
The recent public discussions in India around various issues
around temples exposed what has been overlooked so far in our conversations
about religion, rituals and temples – which is that us general public do not
know even the basic tenets and frameworks of the religious institutions we
participate in (and I say this without judgement), which by itself would perhaps
only be a happy testament to the glorious tradition of ‘to each her own,’ if
not for the unfortunate fact that those majority of us without a clue to the
principles behind the structures, are quite eager to pass judgement based on
what is most often a superficial reading of traditions that completely misses
the spirit of the practice and therefore clutches at shadows in demonising,
denouncing and redesigning what we didn’t even grasp to begin with, thereby
jeopardising not just the quality of the religious experience of the measly
span of our generation but more importantly, the very nature and practice of
the belief systems of that critical and eternal entity called posterity.
While most “dhārmika-s”
– both the tiny section who know the underpinnings of how the dharma works and the
large majority who perhaps don’t really know but believe enough in the
authenticity of the lived experiences of their ancestors before them and who
therefore follow the dharma anyway, hoping it would reveal its Truths to them through the practice – have always been
reluctant to stand up and speak against the dilution of their culture (unfortunately
by the very same people who have the mantle of protecting, practising and
carrying it forward), in the firm belief that the good Lord doesn’t need anyone
to defend Him/ Her, they have in recent times, been more vocal in opposing
forces that to them, seem to be carefully set up specifically to attack the
perceived vulnerabilities of an ancient way of life. On the other hand are
people misapplying secular principles to a religious question.
However, the arguments back and forth while increasingly
strident, don’t seem to serve the purpose of communicating – each to the other. This is primarily because
both parties are talking from completely different frameworks (or let us assume
so in our naiveté) and are therefore unintelligible to each other. The
framework of the modern rationalist is pretty obvious to most of us but the
framework of the dhārmika isn’t, even
to herself. So this is a humble attempt to present the temple framework as it
is, as presented in the canonical texts, as practised in the subcontinent for
more than at least 2500 years, in the hope that knowledge would empower us all
and we could then actually hear each other and have more meaningful
conversations – and arguments.
First, let me offer my credentials for doing so. Apart from
love, a deep sense of obligation to the civilization that has lit my personal
journey and a family heritage of being born into an Adisaiva Sivacharya family,
which while serving mostly as a disclaimer, also got me front row seats to the
tradition, my claim to be able to present even a tiny bit of the āgama-s is based off the research work
done to fulfil my PhD requirement, for a thesis titled, “Temple Management in
the Śaivāgama-s,” an
inter-disciplinary research made possible by the vision and generosity of my
guide and former HOD of the Department of Sanskrit at the University of Madras,
Prof. Siniruddha Dash, who bravely took me under his wings when I decided –
after an engineering degree, MBA and corporate career – to pursue Śaivāgama research.
With so much being said and written about how temples – the nerve
centres of a long unbroken living religion – should be managed, with
implications for worship schedule, materials, people and land management, my thesis
attempted to go back to the source material and understand temple structure,
function and organization as prescribed in the Śaivāgama-s. Why the Śaivāgama-s?
Because they are the ancient canonical temple scriptures that are still used in
the planning, design, construction, consecration of and worship at Śaiva temples. Our logic was, if the Śaivāgama-s have such detailed instructions
on how to build temples and worship at them, surely there must be some clues there
as to how to manage them? And the answers
we found to this question were astounding.
But we’ll first back up a little bit and start with what temples
are and why we should even care what happens there.
To be continued.
Comments
- Navneet Bal